WTO / Trade & Environment
The relationship between WTO law and international law
is one of the key challenge of trade law. This is particularly true in the interface between WTO law and the wide domain that the trade community often calls 'non-trade
issues,' which include environmental and public health concerns, as well as
other societal matters. This problematic is also addressed in some instances
in the WTO case law. This interface in fact constitutes arguably the most
important boundary between the respective mandates of the United Nations
(outside the Security Council) and the WTO. The key to a satisfactory
governance of this interface can be seen in the
principle of mutual supportiveness (principe du soutien mutuel, voir
article dans la Revue générale du droit inernational publique No. 2007-4, de
Prof. Laurence Boisson de Chazournes et Makane Moïse Mbengue).
There is great concern in the trade &
environment community that many of the environmental issues contained in the
2001 Doha Development Agenda
will in reality not be taken seriously at Round. This is why the
2005
Geneva Declaration on Trade & Environment
postulates, on the
occasion of the WTO's 10th anniversary on January 1, 2005, a 10-point action
program with the aim of re-invigorating related discussions and
negotiations. The WTO's 6th
Ministerial Conference
in December 2005 in Hong Kong (SEE FOUR ANALYSES) has been very
disappointing with regards to trade & environment.
One of the key aspect of the
relationship between Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the WTO
concerns the so-called chilling effect, i.e. the negative impact of the
trade regime on the negotiation and implementation of environmental
agreements (Stilwell
and Tuerk, 1999). Since 1999 a considerable literature has discussed
various aspects and meanings of the chilling effect, also called regulatory
chilling; in many cases this term is not used but the same idea is
nevertheless explored. The Stilwell and Tuerk article must in fact be
considered as a contribution to this debate which has turned out to be of
historical importance.
The rapid growth of the biofuels market, one of the key new issues in
trade & environment, is closely linked to energy policies and their relation
to climate change. The analysis by
UNCTAD'S Simonetta Zarrilli (2006) weights the promise of these
technologies versus the potentially important negative development
implications of this strategy.